Measures of Scholarly Esteem


SLIS faculty member Ying Ding and SLIS Dean Blaise Cronin co-authored an article for the journal Information Processing and Management (Volume 47, Issue 1, January 2011, pages 80-96) published by Elsevier. The full-text article is available online through ScienceDirect. The abstract is included here:

Popular and/or Prestigious? Measures of Scholarly Esteem

"Citation analysis does not generally take the quality of citations into account: all citations are weighted equally irrespective of source. However, a scholar may be highly cited but not highly regarded: popularity and prestige are not identical measures of esteem. In this study we define popularity as the number of times an author is cited and prestige as the number of times an author is cited by highly cited papers. Information retrieval (IR) is the test field. We compare the 40 leading researchers in terms of their popularity and prestige over time. Some authors are ranked high on prestige but not on popularity, while others are ranked high on popularity but not on prestige. We also relate measures of popularity and prestige to date of Ph.D. award, number of key publications, organizational affiliation, receipt of prizes/honors, and gender."

Posted November 11, 2010

Media Contact

Ken Bikoff
Communications Specialist
Phone: (812) 856-6908